Erro C00000005 Gtas Vc

"Because even if you want, you also play" 3 meter

I am pleased that the "politic" of Desideratum begins to take hold, thanks to bloggers who choose to participate and the readers who are leaving their comments. The following is a post about politics and free market. Without further introductions, I leave the post of @ kyuutz , the iconoclastic favorite of many of you. Critics of unbridled, free market advocates: atásquense.

False Freedoms.

For

Kyuutz .

The economy and politics. Two of the subjects that are more sterile and boring to the vast majority of people (even among those who describe themselves as "cults"). Speaking of general hatred of the population in a field of study, I can say that mathematics only generate more rejection. Curious: are we talking about exactly those points that people in power to dominate perfection, whether we speak of political or economic power. The great financiers are good mathematical ... very limited, but good.

now said that the information is power. I say that this information can only become real if you can put in the right place. But it has an effect that is negligible for the rest: if you can leverage that information, you become a person who is not so easily deceived, who knows how to defend and having a rational opinion. And this, again if used the right way, influence people around you.

One of the things that should interest us more than the destination (although I shit the buzzword) of our government and many businesses and the actions they take to influence our lives. I have nothing against people who are "apolitical" but I have a lot against people who are hopelessly stupid. Within this sector I can name all those to which concepts such as democracy, communism, free market, they sound like dictatorship and Fourier transforms as explained in Hebrew by a panda. Is not the same be an "apolitical" reported that a dickhead who lies to watch 6 hours of trash TV and then say "psss is policy that spawn and pss me anyway iraaaaa can do nothing."

One of those issues, probably the most influential in our way of life, economic theory and the system now known as "free market " or "free enterprise."

Many people are concerned about achieving democratic systems in countries. It argues that democracy is one of the best systems of government and by the consensus of the majority you can define the path a country (defined as a politico-cultural conglomerate), taking into account the views of minorities. This raises welfare, and above all, you can check excesses of power, which is a common temptation among the people who run (chosen by a majority of citizens) and that at any moment can be removed by the same social group that elected. That's the theory, of course.

But quite apart from a discussion about democracy, its benefits and its shortcomings, it is doubtful if anything serves that political democracy now, if you have interference from those who really wield power. José Saramago said in a speech in 2002 during the global forum of Porto Alegre (and sorry to quote a "sacred cow" ... but I doubt those who called that they have read it in depth) and lapidary some harsh words about the democracy ( here the entire quote):

[...] The voter may be removed from power a government that does not like and put another in its place, but their vote has not, does not have and never have a visible effect on the only real force that rules the world, and therefore his country and himself: I mean obviously economic power, particularly that part of the ever increasing, companies governed by under multinational control strategies that have nothing to do with that common good, by definition, aspire to democracy.

course, supporters of free market version of "extreme" will say that this is not true that this economic system is democratic because it allows users to choose when and what to buy. Can be defined as "a process in which many people act individually, driven by personal initiative, to conduct exchanges among themselves and without government intervention to guide those actions. "The government does not intervene in any way other than to facilitate the field so that these business relationships are conducted smoothly and that everyone can buy what you want in your paycheck amount permitted and everyone will be happy because you can buy many things and reign of heaven on earth and so on.

Cute, very cute. But we must remember the enormous differences between practice and theory. First, believe that everything the state does is bad and that all departments are bad and all they do is good business a generalization idiot. Secondly, we must learn that not everything is a commodity.

is not a pure mechanism that determines prices, not the match of supply and demand acting unrelated to their social environment. The market always operates in a social context, and this includes legal and regulatory mechanisms. NO is a perfect process. And that means it is subject to the interests of a company or many to tip the scales in your favor, and depending on its size and influence this may cause engage in illegal practices. Practices should punish the government but due to the influence and power of some companies, they do not, or at least not as they should.

Microsoft, for example. The recurring example of successful company, born into a free-market economic system (or as close to it). Offers products to consumers, who apparently are what they seek. Its success lies in the simplicity to manage their operating systems. Not the best, but it is what computer users want and has an impressive success. Therefore, that in its best moments came to dominate up to 95% of the software market. Currently complies with a miserable 89.62% . dangerously If that is not identical to a monopoly, then I do not know anything. So Where is the claim that the free market prevents monopolies? Must appear odiadísima government intervention to implement the antitrust . That failed in practice. Were forced to split between the divisions of operating systems and internet applications. But the main body of the company remains the same. Where is the freedom to choose, the mechanism of supply and demand, restrictions on companies that abuse their position of power, for example, handling trials at will?

Another common claim is about the huge benefits of these investments in countries underdeveloped or developing. Of course, as in Nigeria, a country that has filled Shell benefits, such as massively polluting the Niger Delta, causing disease in the population, not to mention, of course, the systematic persecution of opponents of the abuses of power of company (yes, although that term is so related to political power). Does the free market alone is going to punish the company fairly? "Shell tells you how to get oil to consumers?

In my opinion, there is no champion of this economic system that Ayn Rand (I quote it because people like Milton Friedman and Francis Fukuyama frankly I find repulsive). And Ayn forgive me, for "The Fountainhead" is one of my favorite books of all time. So let us play: I will mention some of his phrases and see what can be said about them:

• " Capitalism is not merely practical, but it is the latest moral of the story." Oh, sure, we saw that Enron, Microsoft, Shell and Bayer, to name but a few are very moral. Ah yes, is that she talks about the concept of "individual freedom", which is wonderful, except that we are social animals and sometimes we think about the common good. Yes, I agree individualism, but not to the point of becoming alienated society. For further reference, see "The Naked Ape" by Desmond Morris, only as a representative example.
• " is the free market that makes monopolies impossible ." Sure. If it worked perfectly. And NO human system works perfectly.
• " Capitalism has been the only system in history in which wealth is not acquired by looting, but by production, not by force but through trade, the only system that has defended the right of men to his own mind, his work, his life, themselves. " LOL, ¿ United Fruit Company , dice usted?
• " El capitalismo ha creado los mayores estándares de vida jamás conocidos en el mundo. La evidencia es incontroversible. El contraste entre Berlín Occidental y Oriental es la demostración definitiva, como un experimento de laboratorio a la vista . Aún así los que más alto proclaman su deseo de eliminar la pobreza son los que más alto denuncian el capitalismo. El bienestar humano no es su objetivo." Pero señora, en el capitalismo siempre habrá ricos y pobres, no puede haber eliminación de la pobreza, eso es una falacia. Siempre habrá empresarios y empleados, y estos últimos están obligados to sell their labor at ridiculously low prices because they are determined by supply and demand, and competition in a large-type fish-eats-boy, who offer the same at a lower price is hired. And that causes wages to be increasing downward.

And since we are talking about poverty, we turn to issues of "common good" (horror!) As security and social assistance. Following the logic of market health is just another product, therefore, is subject to fluctuations, again, supply and demand. If a population is abundant, the demand for medical services will increase. A higher demand, prices rise. For Therefore, you can not afford is fucked. Yes, "the only moral system in history." That's where it enters the state social security, which will cause blisters and cramps to free-market advocates, but the only thing that guarantees the right to health of disadvantaged populations. Analyzing, opposition to social assistance is part of a problem of selfishness ridiculous levels ("Why should I pay my taxes the health of these people?") Combined with ingenuity ("the state to issue vouchers to obtain Private health care services "). That prejudice that health institutions are worthless is motivated also by poor service que se otorga en esos lugares en el primer nivel de atención. Pero, si me preguntan, prefiero ser operado en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología o en el Centro Médico Siglo XXI que en el Hospital Ángeles en caso de tener una enfermedad grave. Analicen las cosas objetivamente, Chicago boys.

¿Y qué ocurre con todo aquello que no puede ser tasado, etiquetado, envasado, comprado? El arte, por ejemplo. ¿Los museos que no produzcan suficientes entradas económicas deben desaparecer? Por no hablar de la invasión publicitaria en todos los aspectos de la rutina cotidiana: anuncios en la tele, en la radio (cortes comerciales y anuncios dentro de los programas), en los medios impresos, Internet, on the street. I know that the idiots like those things like Piccadilly Circus or Times Square make them pretty, but I do not want to see all the time invaded the public space of constant advertising, urging me to get happiness by buying a washing machine. Invented the need to always get quick satisfaction at reasonable prices.

I can say, among many other things (that would make much more extensive this armastrote) that as men move in terms of personal interests, which are often quite cretins, and also move the markets. Meet market demands, not needs. Economic rationality does not imply a complete understanding of human behavior, and its use only creates problems as ecological imbalance, pollution, extinction of resources, and financial crises, bank runs, capital flight ... The economic policy pursued by the government focuses on seeking price stability, interest rates, exchange rates and economic growth, and left in a second or third level of social welfare and the consequences of these actions may have on it. So we talk in Mexico of "neoliberalism", although advocates say that economic system that does not exist in the country are measures imposed by international financial institutions and that have not worked. And no, not always because of poor management of economic variables is the government. They remind me of medieval physicians, who all wanted to cure it with indentations.

why Bologna with systems emerge "thought" Victorian type, as Francis Fukuyama and his "end of history." These dimwits think there will be no ideological struggles that the difference between left and right should be for social freedoms, while leaving intact the economic model. Aha, of course. To finish it to get worse, we are too, too many people on the planet competing for limited resources. And that leads to war.

Above: nasty things ( Milton Friedman and Augusto Pinochet, cuatachos ).

During a discussion on this topic on Twitter, someone told me about the war (which is necessary to sustain the market): "What happens is that you live in a pink world. In fact, if Mexico had more wars, we'd be better off financially. And what I say about the pain of people dying in a war, I do not care. People live and die every day, and the victor in a war get higher levels of life. " That father. You give an idea of \u200b\u200bhow they think meagerness these idiots and middle-class.

"An example of an economic system that is not as devastatingly aggressive? Simple: Norway. Exceptionally high living standards, promoted the efficient operation of the combination between business and state. It is very simple: the free market DOES NOT WORK ALONE.

Lionel Jospin French statesman once said "we are not against market-based economy, but the market-based society." The problem is that the latest results from the first.

also said that "a state, when is powerful enough to restrict freedom of enterprise, so is to take away your rights. "And what happens when companies are powerful enough to take away those rights?

As PD is not going to miss taradazo say is that surely you are a state maintained! 11! one! "I quickly commented: work in a company that provides services for banks, and I'ma real estate appraiser and real estate agent , I have no benefits and earned according to the amount of work you do, besides bring my own architectural design business. And with that, now yes, the debate begin. It will be fun.

Sunfish Sailing Boats Toronto

DF Users Unite

"Left, go along. Right, rest."

UPDATE: We aim to gather, before 26 April, more than 300 supporters on Facebook in this group: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid = 110878032276043 & ref = ts

The idea is to demonstrate to officials and people meter Policy Institute for Transportation and Development, the initiative we have proposed some of support among users. So: join and invite your acquaintances.

Yesterday (Thursday, 25 March) raised a good debate in which several people were involved (you can see the hashtag # usuariosmetrodf on Twitter). For most participants it was a good idea that I propose, although others seemed as irrelevant, inadequate or unnecessary. Already said before and will repeat it now: one seeks to eradicate all the ills of public transport, just want to move better when we travel on the Metro. However, as the post with the justification and the proposal was very long I decided to separate. Lean here to justify the project.

Here I go again, though with little pictures and videos for more didactic and clear the proposal.

The idea is simple and common sense.

1. In the Metro escalators are not just to "rest", but to facilitate the mobility of users.

Figure 1. Escalators. Normal progress. (For Soybeto )

2. There is a basic principle of mobility in Mexico just is respected: "row on the left is to advance the right to stop." In Mexico, people usually stop wherever he wants, when he wants to create "traffic waves" that prevent efficient mobility to users.

Figure 2. Escalators. With two obstacles.

3. This rule is not respected, not because we are Mexicans genetically incapable of following rules, but because 1) much people have no idea that this rule exists, 2) no one dares to say anything.

Please watch this video and watch only two kids can climb the stairs before they lock the rows.

Anyway, yesterday I contacted people in the Management of Metro Fixtures, by Adrian Hernandez Cortez and I said there, in total, 357 escalators throughout the network and, indeed, almost no one respects this rule even though in some places this listing.

A colorful ad, yellow, fabulous design that is strategically placed so that all users will see and understand clearly the simple message. Aha, it's obviously sarcasm.

The point of all is this:

People, if they are frequent travelers Metro, we can help spread the basic concept mobility every time we use this transport system. However, a campaign based solely on the "hey, give me compermisito please "be in a vacuum and no one peel. Thus, the proposal is:

1. Collect at least 200 frequent users of the Metro who are willing to collaborate.

2 . request that we provide a distinctive (a badge, flag, hat, etc.) that identifies us as part of a campaign of "effective mobility" of the Metro Public Transport System.

3. Require will make a new poster (may be through a contest, maybe), more attractive and friendly, which is positioned on each and every one of the 357 escaleras eléctricas de la red.

4. Una vez con el distintivo, los voluntarios tendríamos el encargo de que cada vez que usemos las escaleras eléctricas difundamos y repliquemos como mantra el siguiente mensaje: "la fila de la izquierda es para avanzar, la de la derecha es para descansar."

Y ya. En eso estriba toda la idea. No tengo dinero, ni los del Metro tienen dinero para promover algo de mayor calado. Lo siento mucho si les parece demasiado poco. Lo siento mucho si les parece demasiado irrelevante.

Ahora bien, si alguien piensa it is more worthwhile to campaign for people to use the stairs instead of the normal power: forward, are invited to do so, perhaps we could combine efforts later. I give you the contacts of the Metro officials who should be targeted.

Anyway. Here is my proposal, a very simple thing that it would not waste time or energy to anyone. On the contrary, we could win and take the chance to realize that small things like that can start creating different forms of social interaction. Moreover, activating the participation of ordinary people in solving small problems that concern them. Self, they call it.

Thanks. Keep commenting or send mail to jordy182@hotmail.com

Roseville, Ca Good Places For Singles

# Usuariosmetrodf

The obvious

few months ago I travel every day on the Metro, sometimes several times a day. You already know: the Metro is everything, crowding, shoving, arrimones, elbows, noisy vendors, people running, people crying, people laughing, and so on. Obvious: everything is peak power.

But something that always caused me curious is how people use the stairs power, no matter what time or line involved. For a month and a half I started to make notes about things he saw and the ideas that were happening to me.

We've all seen that there are people that are strategically placed in certain cars so that when you arrive at that station, be the first to go out and run up the escalators.

Yes, usually there is always an initial flow of people, more rushed, they do not stop walking down the stairs. The curious thing happens when suddenly the right time always varies, some people get up and leave no progress, creating turn what is called "traffic waves". Even more curious: when this happens, almost no one says anything, no matter if behind those who are blocking the way there is someone who is dying to continue walking.

There is a kind of tacit acceptance that we can not ask the front to put aside. Those who do are very few, almost anyone. Also, if you have to be the last to leave the car, it is tiresome having to "ask permission" to forty people that will surely go to see rare and will not make you case.

All this gives me a mixture of laughter and courage. Several times in Chabacano station, I have to see that the first people to climb escalators become completely standing next to each other. An opportunity was hilarious seeing all the people behind two plump ladies, and nobody could move forward, some all they did was move his feet as a sign of impatience. It was a huge queue. To top it off, then another train came, people went down and the tail was endless. In truth, I wanted to record it and put it on youtube.

situation

Whether it rush hour or not, people tend to stop anywhere in the ranks. Do not give me no. Nor me say it is inefficient to leave a free line at peak hours. If a row is open, people walk by it. It would be rare that "all" are tired and everyone wants to make a filototota the right side and one on the left side.

One more: escalator travels faster and easier, that's what they are intended. If I climb the stairs or under normal, is likely to come at the same time that those who are "resting" in power. But if I walk in the power came in half the time. Plain common sense, as my dear teacher says Esquivel. And finally, I see a rush one day in one of the stations orange line, and up the stairs chorromil there.

As I said, not about how many people there. Agglomerations are everywhere and, at least in the subways of Montreal, Madrid, Barcelona, \u200b\u200bBerlin, they try to respect this comment. No matter if you just finished a concert or a festival and there are thousands of people using the stairs. Can you tell me that in Tokyo, NY or anywhere else does not go well. Well. So?

Well, maybe some will say "oh, no big deal" or "da pushing to pass" or make fun of something as seemingly banal, but the thing goes further. It These forms of mobility and social interaction are not small matters. I do not want elbowing and a set of impertinent fool and knows what else. I just want to respect a basic principle of motion in almost all meters in the world, people hurry up with the row of the left and those who want to "rest" a moment he stood on the right side.

The politicism

recently talked with someone about this and he said he had once already tried a campaign called "Left to move, right to stop, but obviously some politicians right jumped up and tore their clothes, saying it was something electioneering, a form of indoctrination and so on. The Public Transport System then put tiny signs that says "give way to the left" or something, but they are very visible and in any case, useless.

Even before even explain my project, I began to pour some criticisms and comments that "after you use the other stairs" or "post is that it is very difficult to do something."

I say we do not have to be so difficult and that nothing is lost in trying to change something, whether as "X" as what I'm saying. The escalators are not just for "rest", but also serve to increase or decrease faster.

The project, as it: up there.

Yamaha Snowmobile Clutch

Justification "For though not want, you also play "

Introduction dispensable.

Every day, we like it or not, live with events, situations and circumstances that fall within the realm of "politics." We sometimes go unnoticed, but they are there and even more: they affect our lives in a direct way no matter who we are or where you live. On the one hand, the circus activities Members Senators and other "professional politicians" are just the most visible, and sometimes ridiculous, what we mean by politics. These public agreements or in the shadows, these electoral alliances, these debates a bawdy, the calculated murder of such a candidate, those shots of rostrum, that photo with this or that union leader, these discussion forums, etc., etc., often both tired and bored, then translated into the new tax on gasoline or beer in the protection of that governor to his misdeeds, in promoting an agenda other than security, the new government social program in the design country's economic and in terms ample, in the definition of country we are building. Furthermore, ideally the company does not play a passive or reactive role in politics, but can also (some would say "must") is concerned with the "public", press the rulers when they do not keep their promises, punish or reward them vote, to propose alternatives to public problems, and so on. It is not just to march, protest and make scandal when something directly affects my interests, which also tends to get tired and alienate people from politics, but try to understand what is happening, listen to the arguments of others and reflect on how they could solve this specific problem. Of course, that in the ideal world. Anyway, in Roe, apathy, ignorance, or weariness, citizens have found an easy way to justify our wrongs and across the country. "It's the fault of politicians," he often said. And it is true, but it is not so simple.

As already mentioned, so try this spot is from a story or tale of an everyday situation, generate reflections on the political situation in Mexico and show that, as the title the next post,

POLITICAL WE ALL

(Here begins the real post)

By Ana Cinthya Uribe ( @ lunacronopio )

Little talked politics at home. My paternal grandfather, a curator of fear, said he had to vote for the Cock Party - and I do not remember his name, but it must have been ultra-conservative. Little more. From time to time in family meals, long rants about how all politicians were corrupt and horrible and rich and got rich with taxpayer money. And then laughter or covert criticism that bad Uncle architect who was responsible for some public works in the city: well paid, making sure to run everything with the cheapest material and take as long as possible.

As for the politics in school, was something a little strange. Had "elections" for the queen of spring and the girl who won was not the prettiest, nor the most sympathetic, even the barber with the teachers - was one whose parents had more money and managed to sell more boletitos for the carnival. Total: all seemed a bargain.

But it was not. College-educated nuns strangely aware, enter the nineties trying to fully understand the "democratic" system of the country. We talk about the things you could do if used well the votes. Bounce heard things crash, I attended a couple of discussions among the friends of my parents ... I started thinking about how it was that one became a politician and then, of course, president.

illusion to me to be president - the first president of the country, of course. Do not know why, but it was nice that "working for Mexico." In 94, my sister civics teacher told us about the recovery of their citizenship, how for the first time since he took the habit could vote, how important could ... Then, fifteen years, I saw the country reeling from a murder. "That man looked like a good man," my mother said while watching television amazed, again and again, with scenes of Colosio falling behind.

Total - the next time and I had to vote. And in high school I met with typical communist to the bone (which, incidentally, now working for the government of the PAN), with those who believed in the importance of continuity of the PRI and those who voted and who was nothing to more to have a different party in power. I saw growing up in the rumor, the momentum, at school and at home. Suddenly, vote again have a reason to be. After the explosions in Guadalajara, too, and the bad management that had made this local authority, was so important to vote ...

went to vote. A man who, nevertheless, did not follow necessarily the most classic way to politics - had been a businessman and director of an MNC. We were all: my parents, my grandparents, I ... even my younger brothers to the "feast of democracy" that had mounted IFE. I returned to the editorial work. There celebrated the victory of the change.

I knew change would not be immediate. Sensed by that which is not possible to break the inertia of a sudden - but after a while I thought it did not break any. And I kept wondering how you became one of those despicable politicians, a president without major change capabilities.

Then I saw it clear: we are all politicians. As I said the other day Gezeta, no way to be apolitical of all, we make decisions that affect us and others. But at the end of the day, I guess it's easier to have a sub-race which had been detected and put them all the blame ... as if they had inherited a kingdom that have no access.

I think the most important to me of politics now is the need not to feel helpless before it. I do not want to be president of the republic, but I want you to those who took the policy as a profession produce results - and hopefully cure my doctor when I get a Gripon. My job, I think, is developing as a conscious policy and demanding public. And, returning again to Gezeta , voting as a lark horse with only one alleged ideology in the head (you know that ideologies are exchanged for votes). Voting based on proposals and follow the same: keep in office who get results. Not those who have so much time there that we can think how we could throw them.

Mount And Blade Error Help Installing 1.011

" presidential Island, excellent parody to laugh at our leaders.

It's Friday night, nobody in their right mind would do another post politicism unless I do not know, el Peje has declared his love for Salinas, and Calderón and Fernandez Noronha has been captured by signing a pact of alliance between the PAN and the PT, or I do not know. Sorry, I understand.

Finally, as we say around here: LOLS life would be meaningless without a valle de amargura, una almorrana en las nachas, una papa sin catsup, así que aquí les dejo mi pequeña contribución.

El video que podrán apreciar a continuación es parte de una serie llamada

"Isla presidencial"

¿Y? Bueno, por principio de cuentas se trata de una parodia animada de "Lost", la afamada serie gringa. Ya sé, muchos dirán: "Típico, se quieren aprovechar de la fama de una serie increíblemente buena, bien pensada, con misterios fascinantes" y no sé qué más. Bien, pueden decirlo, fans from hell Lost. But watch the video, I like that I recommend. Without doubt, the star element is so thin that make mockery of our twelve Latin American leaders (Chavez, Evo, Uribe, Lula, Cristina Fernandez, Calderon, et al.), After being trapped on a desert island (as the Trailer "no food, no help, no power").

not read more, watch the video and, if they have a slight idea of \u200b\u200bwho the protagonists, laugh like crazy:

Extreme Nasal Congestion Help

New section "Because you like it or not, you also play"